I thought I will have an easier time this semester after dropping one module which I had absolutely no background on; I was wrong. I dunno if I should blame myself for being stupid or unlucky to have lecturers suck at teaching. They should be locked away in labs to do research, that's the area where they can excel.
Genes and Society is becoming more and more greek to me, especially when I have a lecturer who sprouts terms that only students with biology background could understand. To make things worse, this lecturer had some problems in articulation of those big words. I tried to be diligent; sent him an email asking where in the textbook can I find more details on the previous lectures, as I could not figure out what was topics had he covered.
I wrote:
"Dear Prof Leung,
I am a student with no biology background, but I want to do well for this subject. I had been feeling lost on the previous lectures as I am not familiar with the terms used. I bought the textbook, and I wish to know where does the previous 4 lectures map to in the textbook, so that my diligence can set in to make up for the lack of experience in biology. I checked up the syllabus section in IVLE, but still could not link the previous lectures to the chapters in the book, as I don't understand which areas in the book are the lectures sessions covering.
Also, I realised that there are some missing points in the printouts that is included in the powerpoint slides that you showed in lectures. I know the intention of you doing so is to encourage people to come for lectures, but for people like me, I found it even harder to understand the lecture when I have to copy the missing points while you speak. Sorry for being so troublesome, I am not intelligent in the area of biology. However, on my part, I am willing to put in extra effort in order to complete this module with a good understanding of Biotechnology. Thanks for reading my email."
And he replied:
"It is very difficult to have a text book that match 100% with our lectures. You can find some of the topics in C 1 & 2. This text book is by far the best text book that I know which match our syllabus. For some terminology, you also can go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page for a short explanation. You are welcome to ask me questions after class or come to my office. If I am going too fast on some slides, you can raise up your hand and I will stop so that you have time to copy down the extra notes." He is not answering my questions. I need some directions, but he just won't show me the directions. Of course I know that the textbook cannot 100% match the lectures, but can't he just tell me how I can make myself understand his lectures better? How can I shoot him questions if I dun even know what the heck is going on? I did not criticize on his delivery speed, I am just asking him to give the full details of the lecture notes, is it very hard to do so?
Perhaps it is my fault after all, I should never have chosen this module in the first place. But hey, it is a general education module, shouldn't the lecturer teach in a way that non biology students can understand? He said so in his first lectures, but his words can only be deciphered for those who had biology background.
There are more. The lecturer for CS2100 is another terrible teacher. He kept asking questions that nobody can understand, except for one guy whom I suspect already had strong background on computer hardware. He kept introducing new terms without explaining what it mean, same as that Prof Leung. And the further he went into his teaching, the more uncertain I feel about this subject.
MA1301 is another killer. This time round, I can still understand the lecturer. Although the lecturer's teaching sucks initially, but I can see that he had improved a bit. That had resulted in me not being clear about 3 chapters. Once again, I tried to be diligent. To my horror, there are errors in the textbook, and I took quite a while to realize that. What is even more exciting is that there are no examples covered in lectures to deal with the tutorial questions that he posed. 7 questions - 1 which I can confidently do, 2 which I can get the answers but not dunno how I get them and 4 which I had no idea how to solve.
Even my most favourite Java subject is delivered using Mathematics. Why can't the lecturer just use real world examples to teach the programming techniques? Why must he use complex numbers and make everything so complicated? What make it worse is that we are expected to know those useless mathematics. Why must NUS do things the complicated way when there are simpler way to do the same task?
Am I stupid? Am I not focused enough? Am I not hardworking enough? Why are there so many modules that I can't understand? Urghh, I miss my poly days; helpful lecturers, straight-forward way of teaching, powerful time table system, responsible administrative staff. Is being in a "world-class" University something to be happy about? No I dun thing so.